ATR Step 2: Where and How to Get Images

by Anna Busch, David Lassner and Aneta Plzáková


Lire la version française de cet article : https://harmoniseatr.hypotheses.org/3780
Diesen Beitrag auf Deutsch lesen: https://harmoniseatr.hypotheses.org/2717


Whether photographed in an archive or discovered in the digital collections of memory institutions like libraries or museums, for many humanities scholars, images of text sources form the basis of their academic work. Finding, creating and collecting images of textual material is often the first step in the research process. Let us show you some typical ways of acquiring scanned images.

Archives and other memory institutions offer a wealth of material that has not yet been digitized. If you are struggling to obtain digital copies of the documents you are interested in, visiting the institution and requesting the digitization of specific items may be necessary.

Digitisation of archive material: Anna Busch scanning a book

As most memory institutions – slowly but surely – move into the digital age, your digitization journey will usually begin in the comfort of your own home, searching through digital finding aids and preparing lists of the relevant institutions and archival materials to request for digital copies.

Once the archival staff has prepared the required files for you, your work of selecting relevant archival materials begins. It is rare that an entire archival folder will be relevant to you. Here, a careful selection might save not only the time of the archivists doing the digitization, but also your wallet.

Most archives and other memory institutions have clearly defined conditions under which digital copies of archival material can be provided and how they can be used. These rules may be part of a general contract between the user and the particular archive, but in the case of a larger digitization project it might be necessary to create a separate contract with project-specific rules.

Digitization of archival materials may be done directly by the user, but often the digitization is carried out by a specialized department within the archive or an external provider. In this case, the user should specify the preferred quality of the digitized material so that it can fit the criteria for the subsequent ATR process. This service is usually chargeable and the final price is based on the number of items digitized.

Once digitization has been done and the resulting scans have been delivered to you, your ATR journey can begin.

Even if visiting an archive might be a great and often joyful opportunity, sometimes sources that have entered the public domain can be found online on the Internet Archive or Google Books. These sources consist of a collection of scans with an added layer of optical character recognition (OCR) which is, in most cases, not of any usable quality. Both types of data are combined into a PDF that can be downloaded.

How about copyright and reuse?

However, it is typically not clearly indicated within Google Books what type of reuse or republication of the digital images is permitted. Instead, the scanned document is preceded by a page that clearly states that the document’s copyright is owned by Google. What does that mean for a source that is in the public domain?

The copyright here refers to the digital object, the image of the scan, not the analogue print, nor the textual content of the source. That means that if you are planning to use only the textual content of the source there is no copyright in your way. Whenever you do need to use or republish the scans there might still be fairly convenient way.

Under copyright or not? There might be a difference concerning the printed book, the scan or the textual content

When Google Books accumulated the digital sources, they partnered with many cultural Heritage institutions (CHI), via individual contracts. Through several of these contracts that went public we know that the CHI obtains a digital copy of the scan that they can distribute to researchers. So if you find a relevant PDF on Google Books of which you need the copyright of the digital object clarified, identifying the partner institution for this particular scan from the Google Books metadata and asking for a permissive license from the CHI is a viable route. Typically, one should receive a response within a week.

Inside an Archive: Aneta Plzáková at the moving storage rack shelves

Relevant questions to ask…

To sum up, the relevant questions that you need to ask prior to using Google Books or Internet Archive sources are: What type of data do you need from the PDF? (Text/Para-Text/Digital Object) Are you planning to research the sources or are you planning to republish the sources (for example, as part of training data for other ATR projects)? Depending on your objectives, you may be satisfied with:

  • Using the Google Books PDF directly
  • Obtaining a permissive license from the partner CHI
  • Creating an envelope data set that does not contain the actual copyrighted digital object but enriches it with quality annotation such as transcriptions and only references the copyrighted digital object.

With so many different stakeholders, pathways and decisions, navigating the ATR process can be overwhelming. That is why there are efforts from the community to simplify interactions and workflows in the future.

Heritage Data Reuse Charter

When you are planning to publish your research outcomes, it might be helpful to consult the Heritage Data Reuse Charter, an initiative by DARIAH. The Charter contains six points on which cultural heritage institutions and researchers should agree upon when working together, including principles of

  • Reciprocity: Do both Cultural Heritage Institutions and Researchers agree to share content and knowledge equally with each other, making use of data centers and research infrastructures?
  • Interoperability: Cultural Heritage Data will be made accessible in a form that facilitates reuse of the data for research. Formats should work and be interoperable for both scholars and CHIs.
  • Citability: Cultural Heritage data and any resulting research need to be fully citable to increase their visibility and impact. Relevant data citation standards should be applied.
  • Openness: Cultural Heritage data should be shared under an open license whenever possible, taking into account existing copyright and any restrictions due to national legislation and privacy issues.
  • Stewardship: Long-time preservation, persistence, accessibility and legibility of cultural heritage data should be a priority.
  • Trustworthiness: The provenance of Cultural Heritage data and any consequent research should be clear, up to date, openly available and therefore trustworthy.
Cultural Heritage Reuse Charter by DARIAH, https://www.dariah.eu/activities/open-science/data-re-use/.

If you want to learn more about the next steps in the ATR pipeline have a look at part three of the series dealing with image optimisation.


All images: Anna Busch and Aneta Plzáková, CC-BY 4.0

To cite this article: Anna Busch, David Lassner and Aneta Plzáková, “ATR Step 2 – Where and How to Get Images”. In: Anne Baillot, Mareike König (ed.): Automatic Text Recognition. Harmonising ATR Workflows, xx.05.2024, https://harmoniseatr.hypotheses.org/332.

OpenEdition suggests that you cite this post as follows:
Anna Busch (May 16, 2024). ATR Step 2: Where and How to Get Images. Automatic Text Recognition. Retrieved July 13, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.58079/11ohm


Anna Busch

Dr. Anna Busch ist stellvertretende Leiterin des Theodor-Fontane-Archivs der Universität Potsdam. Ihre Forschungs-, Arbeits- und Publikationsschwerpunkte umfassen die digitale Erschließung, Präsentation und Analyse kultureller Sammlungen.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search